Government announces review of the EP&A Act
- Details
- Published on Thursday, 25 August 2011 13:42
The Government announced that it had established a Review into the Act and appointed former Liberal member for Gordon Tim Moore and former ALP member of the Legislative Council Ron Dyer to conduct it. We met with them on 12 August at their invitation as part of speaking to organisations in the industry with an interest. They wanted a broad brush discussion.
The Committee of Management had met earlier in the day and we had that discussion. It was also timely for the Committee to appoint our Gosford delegate Jo Doheny to a vacant position on the Committee because Jo is a strategic planner. The Committee resolved some broad approaches, these are incorporated into a some broad observations and Paul O'Brien, Jo Doherny and I had an hour and a half with the Review that afternoon.
The Review is starting with a blank page. Apparently with no direction from Government but with a claimed open mind about how planning and development should be managed in the State.
The Review is also committed to a serious process of consultation across the State. While the dates and specific locations in the Metropolitan area are not finalised, we do know where they will be each week.
Starting Sunday 11 September - Broken Hill, Dubbo, Narrabri, Glenn Innes, Armidale
Starting Monday 19 September - Blue Mountains, Lithgow, Bathurst, Orange, Parkes
Starting Monday 26 September – Taree, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Ballina/Byron, Lismore/Tweed
Starting Monday 17 October - Campbelltown, Hurstville, Willoughby, Parramatta
Starting Monday 24 October – Nowra, Batemans Bay, Bega, Cooma, Queanbeyan
Starting Monday 31 October - Moss Vale, Goulburn, Yass, Wagga Wagga, Albury
Starting Tuesday for October - Wollongong, Deniliquin, Griffith, Gosford
Starting Monday 10 October - Tamworth/Liverpool Plains/Gunnedah, Muswellbrook, Newcastle and EPLA Conference in Sydney
Starting Monday 7 November - Penrith, Sutherland, Warringah, Randwick, Ashfield
Starting Monday 14 November - City of Sydney
The Review is planning to produce an Issues document in the first week of December and public comment will be open until 17 February. Recommendations to government are planned for the end of April.
The Review plans to maximise access to information and is not necessarily committed to the current legislation remaining one Act.
The review is interested in:
- What should be the underlying philosophy and objectives
- how to set out plans to do that
- how to assess individual plans
- review of the current appeal rights process
- how to define a “region”
- at what level should plans be made and how should they be made and changed at that level
- what should section 5 do?
And in a refreshing realistic approach, the Review plans to have two meetings in each location with the expectation that one meeting would be attended by the community and elected representatives, and the other meeting would be attended by professionals who work in planning and development.
We urge you to attend these meetings and make your views known. We think its time to return the old BA/DA process so assessment can be proportionate to the complexity of the building.
Later we will be inviting individual and specific suggestions from members to be incorporated in our submission to the Review.
You can keep in touch with what's happening with the Review on www.planningreview.nsw.gov.au
Robbo's Pearls...


Go to jail Meredith!
The High Court on Thursday 3 May hammered the final damning nails into the disgraced corporate reputations of seven James Hardie Board members. The Court unanimously held that the seven non-executive directors had breached their duty to act with care and diligence by approving the release of a statement to the stock exchange in 2001 which misled the market about the company's funding of its workers’ compensation liability. The Court overturned a decision of the NSW Court of Appeal which had let the disgraced directors off the hook.
These people are all corporate bluebloods, previously respected by business, government and the market. They are now disgraced and, trying to cut a complicated story short, the Court also referred back to the NSW Court of Appeal the consideration of penalties including disqualification. The High Court makes it abundantly clear that the Board knew the foundation was underfunded and had specifically developed a strategy to restrict news to the finance pages and their narrow sectional interests rather than provide it generally as news.
James Hardie has killed more Australian workers than most. While Australian workers will continue to die for decades from contact with their products, the damage is not just restricted to anyone employed by them but they've also killed kids, wives, family and friends who came in contact with the dangerous asbestos fibres - fibres known to be dangerous when mined in ancient Greece and the Roman Empire.
Companies manufacturing asbestos sheeting in our lifetime preferred to employ older workers. They believe this managed their financial liability because mesothelioma symptoms take a long time to appear and if they employed older blokes they are more likely to have retired and die before the asbestos gets them.
It is now up to the NSW Court of Appeal to review punishments. Not being able to operate as a company director again is the least of it and the original fines of $35,000 each for these seven should have a series of zeros added.
More is the pity that these are not criminal offences and this lot of miscreants won't end up in jail. It is a pity too that we still don't use the stocks because it would be fitting for the seven executives, and especially ex Chairman (sic) of the Board Hellicar, to spend a few weeks in the stocks in Martin Place so that we can all tell them what we think.
While the High Court has nailed these people for endorsing a misleading media release about the underfunding of their liability, there are many implicated in the approval of the NSW Government for Hardy to restructure and move its centre to the Netherlands as part of a process of trying to quarantine their asbestos liability.
Amongst other things, 80 blueblood respectable people of wealth, privilege and reputation provided character statements in support of Hellicar when first prosecuted. I'm going to publish who those people are.
As the Chair of the Investment Committee of LGS I attended the annual conference of the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors in Melbourne in 2004. The guilty Hellicar participated in a panel about corporate behaviour. She was politely asked a question about the recently announced NSW Government investigation of the underfunding of their liability and she told a packed hall of institutional investors that the company had done nothing wrong and that all would be proven. We suspected it was a lie then and we know it is a lie now and I will always regret I didn't boo and heckle this disgraceful performance.
But no one else did anything either. Institutional investors in Melbourne are all very polite and wouldn’t want to frighten the companies Australian superannuation funds invest in. Even those killing Australians, deliberately underfunding their liability for compensation and misleading the market and everyone else about it.
Maybe it's time to do some frightening.
News articles archive 2011
On 13 October 2010 lawyers acting for Wagga Wagga builder Peter Hurst advised the Council that he would apologise to council staff for his discredited allegations. He then changed his mind without explanation and we have been waiting 588 days for the apology.
View the full article in depaNews November 2010: Developer agrees to apologise in long-running Wagga Wagga unpleasantness


