Gosford apologises for their conga line of incompetents

It might have been lame, it was invariably pathetic, it was a little bit shameful and it had to be squeezed out of them, but Gosford has provided a written apology to our member involved in the hapless investigation by the Council’s conga line of incompetents carried out earlier this year. We reported on it in August.

The letter from the Acting General Manager noted that he wanted to "extend an apology to you for a number of shortcomings associated with this matter" and begrudgingly "acknowledge that the investigation took place over an extended period of time." Well durr.

Why is it so hard for people who stuff something up to acknowledge it, apologise and get on with it?

The recommendations that were made by the President of the IRC have all been adopted by the Council. The Council has agreed to undertake a review of its investigation procedures and "the draft amended documents will be forwarded to all parties to review and comment prior to the review being finalised".

The council also agreed to consult with the unions about training arising from their concern that they didn't think any of our members have any idea at all about the legislation under which they enter properties.

The bans imposed by our members on participating in any investigation by the Council’s Performance Management Auditor (sic) remain. We expect there has been no performance management carried out on anyone in the conga line. Someone or everyone, should have got a good kicking for their role in this fiasco.

The council’s advice was conveyed in a letter dated 13 September, now more than nine weeks ago.

We’ll let you know in the December issue if we have received a draft. We have set the clock on them.

 

It has been

since Gosford council agreed to undertake a review of its investigation procedures and forward a draft for comment.  We're still waiting.

 

Robbo's Pearls...

 

Go to jail Meredith!

The High Court on Thursday 3 May hammered the final damning nails into the disgraced corporate reputations of seven James Hardie Board members. The Court unanimously held that the seven non-executive directors had breached their duty to act with care and diligence by approving the release of a statement to the stock exchange in 2001 which misled the market about the company's funding of its workers’ compensation liability. The Court overturned a decision of the NSW Court of Appeal which had let the disgraced directors off the hook.

These people are all corporate bluebloods, previously respected by business, government and the market. They are now disgraced and, trying to cut a complicated story short, the Court also referred back to the NSW Court of Appeal the consideration of penalties including disqualification. The High Court makes it abundantly clear that the Board knew the foundation was underfunded and had specifically developed a strategy to restrict news to the finance pages and their narrow sectional interests rather than provide it generally as  news.

James Hardie has killed more Australian workers than most. While Australian workers will continue to die for decades from contact with their products, the damage is not just restricted to anyone employed by them but they've also killed kids, wives, family and friends who came in contact with the dangerous asbestos fibres - fibres  known to be dangerous when mined in ancient Greece and the Roman Empire.

Companies manufacturing asbestos sheeting in our lifetime preferred to employ older workers. They believe this managed their financial liability because mesothelioma symptoms take a long time to appear and if they employed older blokes they are more likely to have retired and die before the asbestos gets them.

It is now up to the NSW Court of Appeal to review punishments. Not being able to operate as a company director again is the least of it and the original fines of $35,000 each for these seven should have a series of zeros added.

More is the pity that these are not criminal offences and this lot of miscreants won't end up in jail. It is  a pity too that we still don't use the stocks because it would be fitting for the seven executives, and especially ex Chairman (sic) of the Board Hellicar, to spend a few weeks in the stocks in Martin Place so that we can all tell them what we think.

While the High Court has nailed these people for endorsing a misleading media release about the underfunding of their liability, there are many implicated in the approval of the NSW Government for Hardy to restructure and move its centre to the Netherlands as part of a process of trying to quarantine their asbestos liability.

Amongst other things, 80 blueblood respectable people of wealth, privilege and reputation provided character statements in support of Hellicar when first prosecuted. I'm going to publish who those people are.

As the Chair of the Investment Committee of LGS I attended the annual conference of the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors in Melbourne in 2004. The guilty Hellicar participated in a panel about corporate behaviour. She was politely asked a question about the recently announced NSW Government investigation of the underfunding of their liability and she told a packed hall of institutional investors that the company had done nothing wrong and that all would be proven. We suspected it was a lie then and we know it is a lie now and I will always regret I didn't boo and heckle this disgraceful performance.

But no one else did anything either. Institutional investors in Melbourne are all very polite and wouldn’t want to frighten the companies Australian superannuation funds invest in. Even those killing Australians, deliberately underfunding their liability for compensation and misleading the market and everyone else about it. 

Maybe it's time to do some frightening.

On 13 October 2010 lawyers acting for Wagga Wagga builder Peter Hurst advised the Council that he would apologise to council staff for his discredited allegations.  He then changed his mind without explanation and we have been waiting 588 days for the apology.

View the full article in depaNews November 2010: Developer agrees to apologise in long-running Wagga Wagga unpleasantness

 

Copyright © 2012 The Development and Environmental Professionals' Association (depa). All Rights Reserved. Webdesign: Dot Online